The Argument from Distinct Identity (The Innocent vs. Sinful Distinction)
The primary counter-argument (and themodern Jewish interpretation) is that the Servant is the nation of Israel. However, the Christian argument points to a contradiction in the text if Israel is the subject:
The Servant is Innocent: Isaiah 53:9 states the Servant had done no violence, nor was any deceit in his mouth.
Israel is Consistently Portrayed as Sinful: Throughout the rest of Isaiah, the prophet berates the nation for its sins (e.g., Isaiah 1:4 "a people laden with iniquity").
The Conclusion: Apologists argue it is contradictory for Isaiah to describe the nation as "laden with iniquity" in one breath and then "without deceit" in this passage. Therefore, the Servant must be a righteous individual distinct from the nation. This is reinforced by Isaiah 53:8, which says the Servant was stricken "for the transgression of my people," implying the Servant and "the people" (Israel) are two separate entities.
This is often cited as the strongest theological link. The text describes a specific mechanism of salvation that fits New Testament theology perfectly but struggles to fit the history of Israel.
The Mechanism: The Servant suffers specifically to heal others and bear their iniquities (penal substitution). "He was pierced for our transgressions... and by his wounds we are healed" (53:5).
The Mismatch with Israel: While Israel has suffered historically, Christian theologians argue that Israel's suffering did not bring healing or peace to the nations (Gentiles) that oppressed them. Assyria and Babylon were not healed by attacking Israel.
The Match with Jesus: The narrative of Jesus is explicitly built on the idea that his death paid the moral debt of others, matching the guilt offering (asham) mentioned in Isaiah 53:10.
Beyond broad theology, the text contains a fingerprint of specific, seemingly contradictory biographical details that famously align with the Gospel accounts of Jesus' death:
Silence: "He did not open his mouth" (53:7) parallels Jesus' silence before Pilate and Herod (Matthew 27:12-14).
Criminal Association: He was "numbered with the transgressors" (53:12) parallels Jesus being crucified between two rebels.
The Burial Paradox: The text presents a paradox where the Servant is appointed a grave with the wicked but ends up with the rich in his death (53:9). This aligns with the account that Jesus was assigned to die as a criminal (grave with the wicked) but was buried in the private tomb of Joseph of Arimathea, a wealthy man (with the rich).
The passage follows a U-shaped structure that mirrors the Christian doctrine of the Incarnation and Resurrection (Philippians 2):
Origin: He grows up like a "tender shoot" (humble beginning).
Suffering: He is cut off from the land of the living (death).
Vindication: After the suffering of his soul, he will "see the light of life and be satisfied" (53:11) and God will "prolong his days" (53:10). The argument here is that the text requires the Servant to die and then live again to receive his reward - a pattern that only makes sense in the context of resurrection.
Is Isaiah 53 About Jesus? A Gavin Ortlund video (12 min)
No comments:
Post a Comment